skip to main content
Language:
Search Limited to: Search Limited to: Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Index

A Descriptive Analysis of the Critical Thinking Model in Texas Elementary Education

Quijano, Oswaldo Jorge Van Tassell, Frances S. ; Hull, Darrell Magness ; Harris, Mary Mcdonnell ; King, Kelley M.

2013

Full text available

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    A Descriptive Analysis of the Critical Thinking Model in Texas Elementary Education
  • Author: Quijano, Oswaldo Jorge
  • Van Tassell, Frances S. ; Hull, Darrell Magness ; Harris, Mary Mcdonnell ; King, Kelley M.
  • Description: Contributions from elementary education to the practice and reality of critical thinking are rare, largely because attempts in basic education to elucidate a concept of critical thinking have a hard time breaking through the elusiveness and indeterminacy that characterize the history and reality of the concept. This situation is due to, and a consequence of, the difficulty of delimiting critical thinking from related fields, such as metacognition, higher-order-thinking, problem solving, informal logic, reasoning skills, and decision making, to name a few. Texas school authorities designed and put into practice a battery of tools to evaluate critical thinking through the assessment programs TAKS and STAAR, without taking a position regarding the indeterminacy problems of the content of critical thinking. The purpose of this study was to reconstruct the pieces of the critical thinking model imparted to Texas elementary school children since 1999 and continues today. The findings indicate that the critical thinking model implemented in Texas elementary schools is a particular version of a skills-only approach of critical thinking that follows the classical logical paradigm, consisting of two sets of complementary skills. This model acquaints students with the components and structure of five types of arguments while it fails to substantiate the logic of argument support that demonstrates how reasons support claims and the strength of support. The application of an adequacy conditions rubric showed the strengths of the model at the argumentation analysis level, yet it showed clear signs of incompleteness and inconsistencies at the argument structure level that distort its purpose and function.
  • Publication Date: 2013
  • Publisher: University of North Texas
  • Subjects: Critical Thinking ; Inference ; Elementary Education ; Argumentation ; Critical Thinking -- Study And Teaching (Elementary) -- Texas ; Critical Thinking In Children
  • Language: English
  • Source: University of North Texas

Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait